COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > CQIF Seminar > Preparing topological states on a quantum computer
Preparing topological states on a quantum computerAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Ashley Montanaro. Projected Entangled Pair States (PEPS) are often presented as the natural class of states for modelling ground states of non-critical many-body quantum systems. On the other hand, we know that an oracle which can generate an arbitrary PEPS , given its classical description, is an unreasonably powerful computational resource (PP-complete). So which PEPS are “physical”? In other words, which of them can be prepared efficiently on a quantum computer? This question was raised by Verstraete, Wolf, Perez-Garcia, and Cirac in 2006. Schwarz, Temme and Verstraete recently gave a solution for the sub-class known as “injective” PEPS (which are always unique ground states of local Hamiltonians), in the form of a new quantum algorithm for constructing these states using a quantum computer. The algorithm is efficient as long as the injective PEPS is well-conditioned. This class of states includes many physically interesting ones, such as the ground state of the 2D AKLT model. However, the “injectivity” property rules out all topological quantum states (which by definition cannot be unique ground states of local Hamiltonians). The more general class of G-injective PEPS are defined over a discrete symmetry group G. This more general class of PEPS includes many important topological quantum states: familiar examples such as Kitaev’s toric code, and more exotic examples such as resonating valence bond states. By generalising the PEPS preparation algorithm to the larger class of G-injective PEPS , we show how to prepare these more exotic topological quantum states using a quantum computer. The algorithm is again efficient as long as the G-injective PEPS is well-conditioned. (joint work with Martin Schwarz, Kristan Temme, Frank Verstraete, and David Perez-Garcia) This talk is part of the CQIF Seminar series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsNew Results in X-ray Astronomy 2009 The influence of signal strength on the differentiation of effector and memory T cells Graduate Women's NetworkOther talksAn SU(3) variant of instanton homology for webs Beating your final boss battle, or presenting with confidence and style (easy mode) Childhood adversity and chronic disease: risks, mechanisms and resilience. A compositional approach to scalable statistical modelling and computation Opportunities and Challenges in Generative Adversarial Networks: Looking beyond the Hype The Fyodorov-Bouchaud conjecture and Liouville conformal field theory 'Honouring Giulio Regeni: a plea for research in risky environments' Discovering regulators of insulin output with flies and human islets: implications for diabetes and pancreas cancer Singularities of Hermitian-Yang-Mills connections and the Harder-Narasimhan-Seshadri filtration 'Ways of Reading, Looking, and Imagining: Contemporary Fiction and Its Optics' Interrogating T cell signalling and effector function in hypoxic environments |