COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Category Theory Seminar > Skew monoidal structure on categories of algebras
Skew monoidal structure on categories of algebrasAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Tamara von Glehn. (joint work with M. Fiore) There is a long tradition of constructing monoidal or closed structure on the category of algebras for a monad that is assumed to be commutative, monoidal, cartesian closed, or similar. In each case, one builds a tensor product classifying bilinear maps using a coequalizer. This approach, initiated by Linton’s description of the construction, has been studied by Kock, Guitart and others, while Seal has recently examined the monodial case in some detail. In this talk we explore these ideas for skew monoidal categories, viz. suitably directed versions of monoidal categories in which the structural maps are not assumed to be invertible. I will show that for a strong monad T on a skew monoidal category, the category of T-algebras acquires a skew monoidal structure with a tensor product classifying left-linear maps. I will then characterise the monoids for this left-linear monoidal structure as precisely the T-monoids of Fiore et al, and give two constructions for free monoids in skew monoidal categories. This talk is part of the Category Theory Seminar series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsAMOP/TCM Seminar Project Access Type the title of a new list hereOther talksClimate and Sustainable Development Finance for Industrial Sustainability in Developing Countries Peak Youth: the end of the beginning Nuclear fuel manufacture at Westinghouse Springfields past, present and future Climate change, species' abundance changes and protected areas A lifelong project in clay: Virtues of Unity How language variation contributes to reading difficulties and “achievement gaps” |