Conflicts between optimality criteria for block designs with low replication
Add to your list(s)
Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Richard Samworth.
In designing experiments, we usually seek to make variances
of estimators small. For incomplete-block designs, various ways of
measuring multi-dimensional variance give the A-, D-, and E-optimality
criteria, which I shall explain. If there exists a
balanced incomplete-block design for the given parameters, then it is
optimal on all these criteria. It is therefore natural to use the
proxy criteria of (almost) equal replication and (almost) equal
concurrences when choosing a block design.
However, work over the last decade for block size 2 has shown that
when the number of blocks is near the lower limit for estimability of
all treatment contrasts then the D-criterion favours very different
designs from the A- and E-criteria. In fact, the A- and E-optimal
designs are far from equi-replicate and are amongst the worst on the
D-criterion.
I shall report on current work which extends these results to all
block sizes. Thus the problem is not blocks of size 2; it is low
replication.
This talk is part of the Statistics series.
This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.
|