The concept of separable effects for causal mediation and competing risks analyses

Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal

• Vanessa Didelez, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany
• Friday 21 February 2020, 14:00-15:00
• MR12.

If you have a question about this talk, please contact Dr Sergio Bacallado.

In causal mediation analysis, we are interested in understanding different mechanisms (causal pathways) of a treatment or exposure affecting some outcomes. Often this is formalised in terms of (in)direct causal effects – popular notions of these are based on so-called “nested counterfactuals”. These concepts however run into difficulties of interpretation in the particular context of survival analyses.

I will discuss the problem and propose an alternative approach that does not suffer from such shortcomings [1]: this novel approach follows Robins and Richardson [2], where mechanisms need to be specified allowing a separation into the different treatment paths, formalized using an augmented directed acyclic graph (DAG). It can be shown that under specific assumptions regarding the separability, identification of such alternative mediated effects is possible, resulting in the familiar mediation formula. In continuous time, it can further be shown that for the particular case of combining a linear model for the mediator with an additive hazard model, the familiar “path-tracing” formula can be recovered [3].

For illustration, this is applied to an example of mediated effects of a blood-pressure treatment on time to kidney failure [3]. We investigate intensive versus standard blood-pressure treatment and find that there is little, and not much time-varying, indirect effect via diastolic blood pressure on kidney failure. Hence, other ways of preventing this side effect of intensive blood-pressure treatment might be worth investigated.

The proposed new approach solves a crucial conceptual problem of mediation analysis with a survival outcome and can be extended to competing risks [4]. It is founded in decision theory, avoids genuine counterfactual assumptions and constitutes an interesting alternative to the popular structural equation models.

References

[1] Didelez. Defining causal mediation with a longitudinal mediator and a survival outcome. Lifetime Data Analysis, DOI : 10.1007/s10985-018-9449-0, 2018.

[2] Robins, Richardson. Alternative graphical causal models and the identification of direct effects. In: Causality and psychopathology: Finding the determinants of disorders and their cures, pages 103-158, 2011.

[3] Aalen, Stensrud, Didelez, Daniel, Roysland, Strohmaier. Time-dependent mediators in survival analysis: Modelling direct and indirect effects with the additive hazards model. Biometrical Journal. 2019; (Epub 2019 Feb 19).

[4] Stensrud, Young, Didelez, Robins, Hernán. Separable effects for causal inference in the presence of competing risks. To appear in JASA .

This talk is part of the Statistics series.

This talk is included in these lists:

• All CMS events
• All Talks (aka the CURE list)
• CMS Events
• Cambridge Forum of Science and Humanities
• Cambridge Language Sciences
• Cambridge talks
• Chris Davis' list
• DPMMS Lists
• DPMMS info aggregator
• DPMMS lists
• Guy Emerson's list
• Hanchen DaDaDash
• Interested Talks
• MR12
• Machine Learning
• School of Physical Sciences
• Statistical Laboratory info aggregator
• Statistics
• Statistics Group
• bld31
• custom
• rp587

Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.