University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Computational Neuroscience > Neural representations of uncertainty: the right tool for the right job

  Browse A-Z

Log in

Cambridge users (raven)details Other usersdetails No account?details

Information on

Subscribing to talksdetails Finding a talkdetails Adding a talkdetails Disseminating talksdetails Help and Documentationdetails

Neural representations of uncertainty: the right tool for the right job

Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal

If you have a question about this talk, please contact Dr Máté Lengyel.

In many situations humans and animals seem to use uncertainty information to guide close to optimal behaviour. The neural underpinnings of such probabilistic computation remain highly controversial (Fiser et al, 2010; Pouget et al, 2013). Contrary to the traditional view of probabilistic population codes (PPCs) and sampling-based representations as mutually exclusive alternatives, here we argue that both are useful data structures, needed at different computational stages for (approximately) optimal decision making. First, sampling allows neural circuits to represent the joint statistics over many features and to marginalise out nuisance variables (Savin and Deneve, 2014). Second, PPCs enable a compact, quasi-instantaneous representation of the marginals which can be easily combined with cost-related information to yield approximatively optimal decisions.

We propose a model in which the two are linked via a probabilistic form of evidence integration akin to that in (Boerlin et al, 2011), with the ‘evidence’ given by samples from the target distribution. We use the same spike-based code (Boerlin, 2011) for representing both the sampling, and the evidence-integration modules at the level of neural activity. The core idea is that the circuit evolves through recurrent dynamics such that the relevant signal (either samples from a target distribution, or a PPC -like representation of any of its marginals) can be linearly decoded from neural responses. This shared encoding means that many classic measures of single cell responses are consistent with experimental data and, moreover, are preserved across processing stages. Thus the model provides a computationally well-justified reconciliation between competing probabilistic neural codes and points to population-level analyses as tools for validating probabilistic computation experimentally.

This talk is part of the Computational Neuroscience series.

Tell a friend about this talk:

This talk is included in these lists:

Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.

Other lists

Madingley Lunchtime Seminars Holocaust Memorial Day Global Student Education Forum (GSEF) Lattice field theory informal seminars Contagion and Containment Public Health Policy Talks

Other talks

Auxin, glucosinolates, and drought tolerance: What's the connection? Polish Britain: Multilingualism and Diaspora Community Debtors’ schedules: a new source for understanding the economy in 18th-century England Organic Bio-Electronic systems: from tissue engineering to drug discovery Liberalizing Contracts: Nineteenth Century promises through literature, law and history
 

© 2006-2024 Talks.cam, University of Cambridge. Contact Us | Help and Documentation | Privacy and Publicity