COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Computational Neuroscience > Computational Neuroscience Journal Club
Computational Neuroscience Journal ClubAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Jake Stroud. Please join us for our fortnightly journal club online via zoom where two presenters will jointly present a topic together. The next topic is ‘Nonlinear filtering in neuroscience’ presented by Jean-Pascal Pfister and Xizi Li. Zoom information: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84958321096?pwd=dFpsYnpJYWVNeHlJbEFKbW1OTzFiQT09 Continuously extracting relevant information from a stream of inputs is a key machine learning problem with a wide range of applications in neuroscience. Formally, this problem – also known as nonlinear (Bayesian) filtering – aims at estimating the posterior distribution (or filtering distribution) at time t of some latent variable given all the inputs up to time t. This nonlinear filtering theory can be applied in neuroscience from two different perspectives. Firstly, nonlinear filtering can be seen as a data analysis method where the task is to extract relevant information from continuous neural recording (such as continuously estimating the position of a rat based on place cells activity or continuously estimating the intention of a patient in order to control a neuroprothesis). Secondly, nonlinear filtering can be seen as a computational principle that can be applied at different levels such as the behavioural level (e.g. continuously tracking the position of a prey), neuronal level (estimating the causes of the inputs to a neural network) or even single synapse level (e.g estimating the presynaptic membrane potential). In the first part of this journal club, we will review the theory of nonlinear filtering with the formal solution given by the Kushner-Stratonovic equation. For a tutorial see [1]. We will highlight the limitation of this formal solution in terms of practical applicability and describe the possible approximate solutions. In the second part of the journal club we will discuss one specific application of nonlinear filtering in the context of learning [2,3] and highlight the specific predictions of a synaptic learning rule derived from this nonlinear filtering approach. Refs: [1] Kutschireiter, A., Surace, S. C., & Pfister, J.-P. (2020). The Hitchhiker’s guide to nonlinear filtering. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 94, 102307. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2019.102307 [2] Aitchison, L., Jegminat, J., Menendez, J. A., Pfister, J.-P., Pouget, A., & Latham, P. E. (2021). Synaptic plasticity as Bayesian inference. Nature Neuroscience, 24, 565–571. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-021-00809-5 [3] Jegminat, J., & Pfister, J.-P. (2020). Learning as filtering: implications for spike-based plasticity. arXiv:2008.03198 This talk is part of the Computational Neuroscience series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsDatalog for Program Analysis: Beyond the Free Lunch email hosting uk Three-dimensional cell culture: Innovations in tissue scaffolds and biomimetic systemsOther talksIndigenous Data Sovereignty - Tahu Kukutai [gloknos lecture] Research Ecosystems, Cognitive Bias and Incentives Ageing in Harmony: Music’s Impact on Health & Well-being in Older Adults Symmetry breaking and self-organization in intestinal organoids CSAR webinar: Asteroids, comets and impacts: should we worry? An ancient immunoreceptor educates maternal natural killer cells to optimise reproduction |