COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Computational Neuroscience > Inferring decision rules from evidence, choice, and reaction times
Inferring decision rules from evidence, choice, and reaction timesAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Daniel McNamee. I will present four related projects about decision-making based on one or two evidence streams, focusing on the quantitative relationship between the choice, reaction time, and the contents of evidence. (1) I will show that we can predict choices based on the reported time of covert decisions (decisions without an immediate motor response) in a perceptual decision-making task. We conclude that subjects terminate the decision when accumulated evidence reaches a threshold even when more evidence is available, and that the reported time of the mental event (threshold crossing) is reliable enough to enable prediction. (2) For the decisions reported in (1) and for other types of decisions, it has been suggested that the decision thresholds decrease over time. Here I will present an efficient technique to estimate time-varying decision thresholds without an assumption on their shape. (3) As a step toward more complex decisions, I will discuss perceptual decision-making based on two evidence streams, motion and color. I will show that even when the two evidence streams are available simultaneously at the same location and when only one motor response is required to report the decision, the time to make the combined decision is better explained by the sum of the duration of the two decision processes than by their maximum, suggesting interference. I will also discuss an ongoing project on estimating the degree of interference between the two evidence accumulation processes. (4) Although in (3) we show that there exists interference between the two decision processes, it is unclear if the interference is at the evidence acquisition stage (sensory), or at the evidence accumulation stage (central). I will present a Bayesian reverse-correlation technique to estimate the time-varying probability of simultaneous evidence acquisition from two evidence streams. This talk is part of the Computational Neuroscience series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsSPS Society Clinical ID talks Junior Geometry Seminar Zoology Department - Tea Talks talksOther talksSustainability 101: how to frame it, change it and steer it Index of Suspicion: Predicting Cancer from Prescriptions Phylogenetic hypothesis of the Oleeae tribe (Oleaceae) Diversification and molecular evolution patterns in plastid and nuclear ribosomal DNA The Most Influential Living Philosopher? TODAY Adrian Seminar - "Physiological and genetic heterogeneity in hearing loss" TODAY Adrian Seminar - "Functional synaptic architecture of visual cortex" |