COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Computational Neuroscience > Visuomotor behavior in naturalistic tasks: from receptive fields to value functions
Visuomotor behavior in naturalistic tasks: from receptive fields to value functionsAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Dr. Cristina Savin. Although there is a long tradition of separating perception, action, and learning, these can be treated separately only under very special circumstances. There are both theoretical reasons evident from a treatment of such control tasks in the framework of Markov decision processes, as well as empirical studies having revealed this fact, especially when considering naturalistic sequential visuomotor tasks. We will present results from several studies investigating these dependencies. First, we show that learning of representations of natural visual stimuli through generative models can explain a variety of psychophysical biases only when in addition to the statistics of the natural environment one also takes the influence of the specific imaging system such as the eye as well as the active usage of the visual system into account. Second, we will show how human visuomotor behavior can be quantified using Bayesian inverse reinforcement learning algorithms to extract the reward functions underlying human actions. This analysis demonstrates that the guidance behavior in a navigation task does not necessarily follow the given task instructions and reveals systematic individual differences within subject’s task priorities. Finally, we will present results from a study in which human subjects intercepted moving objects in a virtual environment. Many animals use the well studied constant bearing angle strategy, which has been characterized as a fast and frugal heuristic. The relationships governing the behavior of the environment were manipulated systematically so as to reveal that subjects can indeed quickly learn new sequential control policies. A theoretical analysis shows, that the learned behavior can only be understood by considering the observation and control uncertainties in order to successfully carry out the interception task. This talk is part of the Computational Neuroscience series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsDPMMS Lists 5th Cambridge Assessment Conference: Challenges of assessment reform EED Film Series: 'Educating Rita'Other talksCambridge - Corporate Finance Theory Symposium September 2017 - Day 1 Insight into the molecular mechanism of extracellular matrix calcification in the vasculature from NMR spectroscopy and electron microscopy Mechanical performance of wall structures in 3D printing processes: theory, design tools and experiments The Ambonese Rumphius and his inter-island information networks The potential of the non-state sector:what can be learnt from the PEAS example Protein Folding, Evolution and Interactions Symposium Structural basis for human mitochondrial DNA replication, repair and antiviral drug toxicity Towards a whole brain model of perceptual learning How to Deploy Psychometrics Successfully in an Organisation Statistical Methods in Pre- and Clinical Drug Development: Tumour Growth-Inhibition Model Example |