COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Formalisation of mathematics with interactive theorem provers > Formalizing the divided power envelope in Lean
Formalizing the divided power envelope in LeanAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Jonas Bayer. Given an ideal I in a commutative ring A, a divided power structure on I is a collection of maps $\gamma_n : I \to I$ indexed by $\mathbb{N}$ which behave like the family $x^n/n!$, but which can be defined even if the characteristic of A is positive. From a divided power structure on I and an ideal J in an A-algebra B, one can construct the “divided power envelope” $D_B(J)$, consisting of a B-algebra D with a given ideal $J_D$ and a divided power structure satisfying a universal property and a compatibility condition. The divided power envelope is needed for the highly technical definition of the Fontaine period ring B_cris, which is used to identify crystalline Galois representations and in the comparison theorem between étale and crystalline cohomology. In this talk I will describe ongoing joint work with Antoine Chambert-Loir towards formalizing the divided power envelope in the Lean 4 theorem prover. This project has already resulted in numerous contributions to the Mathlib library, including in particular the theory of weighted polynomial rings, and substitution of power series. Recording: https://youtu.be/QCRLwC5JQw0 This talk is part of the Formalisation of mathematics with interactive theorem provers series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsCambridge University Southeast Asian Forum CHUCOL seminars Aida MartinOther talksTitle TBC Wearable electrocardiography: from Holter to handheld devices The Trees our Teachers – Lessons from Biblical History and Modern Landscapes Quantum Information Larger and more instructable language models become less reliable |