COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Bioinformatics jounal club for the -omics > The use of a power law global error model for the identification of differentially expressed genes in microarray data
The use of a power law global error model for the identification of differentially expressed genes in microarray dataAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Dr N Karp. Matthew Russell will be presenting a paper on the use of a power law global error model for the identification of differentially expressed genes in microarray data. Paper details: Pavelka, N., M. Pelizzola, et al. (2004). BMC Bioinformatics 5(1): 203. Abstract BACKGROUND :High-density oligonucleotide microarray technology enables the discovery of genes that are transcriptionally modulated in different biological samples due to physiology, disease or intervention. Methods for the identification of these so-called “differentially expressed genes” (DEG)would largely benefit from a deeper knowledge of the intrinsic measurement variability. Though it is clear that variance of repeated measures is highly dependent on the average expression level of a given gene, there is still a lack of consensus on how signal reproducibility is linked to signal intensity. The aim of this study was to empirically model the variance versus mean dependence in microarray data to improve the performance of existing methods for identifying DEG .RESULTS:In the present work we used data generated by our lab as well as publicly available data sets to show that dispersion of repeated measures depends on location of the measures themselves following a power law. This enables us to construct a power law global error model (PLGEM) that is applicable to various Affymetrix GeneChip data sets. A new DEG identification method is therefore proposed, consisting of a statistic designed to make explicit use of model-derived measurement spread estimates and a resampling-based hypothesis testing algorithm.CONCLUSIONS:The new method provides a control of the false positive rate, a good sensitivity vs. specificity trade-off and consistent results with varying number of replicates and even using single samples. This talk is part of the Bioinformatics jounal club for the -omics series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsDr T. Ferrus Cambridge University Friends of MSFOther talksSingle Cell Seminars (October) Mysteries of the solar chromosphere explored using the high-resolution observations Pain and physiological processes in sixteenth-century medical texts from Mexico and Spain Phenotypic changes induced by stress and developmental reprogramming in plants Plant host-pathogen coevolution and exploring local adaptation of an Arabidopsis thaliana complex Resistance gene locus Coordination and inequalities in agglomeration payments: evidence from a laboratory experiment Wetting and elasticity: 2 experimental illustrations Immigration and Freedom Networks, resilience and complexity The Gopakumar-Vafa conjecture for symplectic manifolds A feast of languages: multilingualism in neuro-typical and atypical populations Discovering regulators of insulin output with flies and human islets: implications for diabetes and pancreas cancer Adaptive auditory cortical coding of speech |