COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Cambridge Analysts' Knowledge Exchange > Interpolation between Hartree-Fock and Müller functional: Continuity and existence of a minimiser
Interpolation between Hartree-Fock and Müller functional: Continuity and existence of a minimiserAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact . The ground state energy of atoms can be bounded from above by the infimum of the Hartree-Fock functional. Also, numerical results suggest that the Müller functional gives a lower bound for the ground state energy. Thus, the so-called Power functional introduced in [1], which interpolates between these functionals, is an important tool to compute the ground state energy of atoms in quantum chemistry. The aim of my Master’s thesis was to prove rigorous statements for the Power functional. In the talk, I will start with the càdlàg property for the ground state energy depending on the interpolation parameter. Then, the existence of a minimiser for infinitely many electron numbers N and any proton number Z>1/2 will be presented. At the end, I will shortly comment on the recent proof of the ionisation conjecture for the Power functional [2].
This talk is part of the Cambridge Analysts' Knowledge Exchange series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsLaing O'Rourke Centre Seminars Relocating Human Origins - What if Adam lived in the forest? University Research Ethics Committee Events Inference Group Journal Clubs University of Cambridge Environment & Energy SectionOther talksCosmology from the Kilo-Degree Survey SciScreen: Finding Dory Fluorescence spectroscopy and Microscale thermophoresis Amphibian Evolution through Deep Time: Fossils, Genes and Regeneration Reforming the Chinese Electricity System: A Review of the Market Reform Pilot in Guangdong Borel Local Lemma |