COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
Zeno goes to CopenhagenAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Adrian Kent. Measurement-collapse interpretations of quantum mechanics [MCIs] take the orthodox textbook formulation of quantum mechanics literally. In particular, they entail that collapse is a real physical process that is caused by measurement. The standard objection to MCIs is the measurement problem: ‘measurement’ is too vague to be used in the formulation of a physical theory. However, this objection is inconclusive. For example, Wigner showed how ‘measurement’ could be analyzed in terms of conscious observation, and it is possible to make this latter notion precise in terms of modern mathematical theories of consciousness such as the integrated information theory. Here, I pose a more serious objection to MCIs based on the the quantum Zeno effect. The objection can be posed as a dilemma: in MCIs, either measurement can superpose or it cannot. If it can the dynamics are ill-defined; if it cannot, then measurements can never start or finish. I conclude by considering an MCI -like theory that avoids the dilemma by combining the integrated information theory of consciousness with the continuous spontaneous localization theory of collapse. This talk is part of the CQIF Seminar series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsNatural History Cabinet, Cambridge University Department of History and Philosophy of Science MRC Biostatistics Unit Seminars Alex HopkinsOther talksProcollagen quality control at ER exit sites From Sommerfeld diffraction problems to operator factorisation: Lecture 1 Aging, Intelligence, and Slowing of Thought Rapid Identification of Bacteria and AMR Directly from Clinical Samples Using Mass Spectrometry An integrative systems genetic analysis of mammalian lipid metabolism Mapping the Gaps! How do we Fill in the Information Missing from Tree Inventories? |