|COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring.|
Thermally and mechanically driven quantum turbulence in helium II
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Mustapha Amrani.
Topological Dynamics in the Physical and Biological Sciences
In most experiments with superfluid helium, turbulence is generated thermally (by applying a heat flux, as in thermal counterflow) or mechanically (by stirring the liquid). By modeling the superfluid vortex lines as reconnecting space curves with fixed circulation, and the driving normal fluid as a uniform flow (for thermal counterflow) and a synthetic turbulent flow (for mechanically driven turbulence), we determine the difference between thermally and mechanically driven quantum turbulence. We find that in mechanically driven turbulence, the energy is concentrated at the large scales, the spectrum obeys Kolmogorov scaling, vortex lines have large curvature, and the presence of coherent vortex structures induces vortex reconnections at small angles. On the contrary, in thermally driven turbulence, the energy is concentrated at the mesoscales, the curvature is smaller, the vorticity field is featureless, and reconnections occur at larger angles. Our results suggest a method t o experimentally detect the presence of superfluid vortex bundles.
This talk is part of the Isaac Newton Institute Seminar Series series.
This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.
Other listsCMS Special Lectures Hebrew Open Classes Generation to Reproduction Seminars
Other talks'British Imperial Rule in China during the First Opium War (1840-1842)' Vibrating cables & flapping flags: classical fluid-solid instabilities or energy sources ? Human bycatch from camera traps The timing of cirque glaciation in western North America revisited: No Neoglacial in the U.S. Cordillera? Vibrational coherence spectroscopy applied to biomimetic molecular photoswitches Do changes in Subjective Probability Distributions reflect a Prediction Error driven learning process?