On Over-fitting in Model Selection and Subsequent Selection Bias in Performance Evaluation

Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal

• DR. Tom Minka (Microsoft Research Cambridge)
• Thursday 19 May 2011, 14:00-15:30
• Engineering Department, CBL Room 438.

If you have a question about this talk, please contact Konstantina Palla.

This reading group meeting will discuss the following paper:

• “On Over-fitting in Model Selection and Subsequent Selection Bias in Performance Evaluation”
• by Gavin C. Cawley and Nicola L. C. Talbot
• Journal of Machine Learning Research 11 (2010) 2079-2107
• http://jmlr.csail.mit.edu/papers/v11/cawley10a.html

Model selection strategies for machine learning algorithms typically involve the numerical optimisation of an appropriate model selection criterion, often based on an estimator of generalisation performance, such as k-fold cross-validation. The error of such an estimator can be broken down into bias and variance components. While unbiasedness is often cited as a beneficial quality of a model selection criterion, we demonstrate that a low variance is at least as important, as a non-negligible variance introduces the potential for over-fitting in model selection as well as in training the model. While this observation is in hindsight perhaps rather obvious, the degradation in performance due to over-fitting the model selection criterion can be surprisingly large, an observation that appears to have received little attention in the machine learning literature to date. In this paper, we show that the effects of this form of over-fitting are often of comparable magnitude to differences in performance between learning algorithms, and thus cannot be ignored in empirical evaluation. Furthermore, we show that some common performance evaluation practices are susceptible to a form of selection bias as a result of this form of over-fitting and hence are unreliable. We discuss methods to avoid over-fitting in model selection and subsequent selection bias in performance evaluation, which we hope will be incorporated into best practice. While this study concentrates on cross-validation based model selection, the findings are quite general and apply to any model selection practice involving the optimisation of a model selection criterion evaluated over a finite sample of data, including maximisation of the Bayesian evidence and optimisation of performance bounds.

This talk is part of the Machine Learning Reading Group @ CUED series.

This talk is included in these lists:

• All Talks (aka the CURE list)
• Cambridge Centre for Data-Driven Discovery (C2D3)
• Cambridge Forum of Science and Humanities
• Cambridge Language Sciences
• Cambridge University Engineering Department Talks
• Cambridge talks
• Centre for Smart Infrastructure & Construction
• Chris Davis' list
• Computational Continuum Mechanics Group Seminars
• Engineering Department, CBL Room 438
• Featured lists
• Guy Emerson's list
• Hanchen DaDaDash
• Inference Group Journal Clubs
• Inference Group Summary
• Information Engineering Division seminar list
• Interested Talks
• ML
• Machine Learning Reading Group
• Machine Learning Reading Group @ CUED
• Machine Learning Summary
• Quantum Matter Journal Club
• Required lists for MLG
• School of Technology
• Simon Baker's List
• TQS Journal Clubs
• Trust & Technology Initiative - interesting events
• bld31
• custom
• ndk22's list
• ob366-ai4er
• rp587
• yk373's list

Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.