Why do neurons spike spontaneously?

Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal

• Tim Vogels (University of Oxford)
• Monday 27 April 2020, 16:30-17:30
• Online on Zoom.

If you have a question about this talk, please contact Jake Stroud.

Zoom information:

Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/99176276471?pwd=c0RtbFpSUGNOUTgrUjJPZWxHN1pJdz09

Meeting ID: 991 7627 6471

Password: 314708

Talk abstract: Spontaneous firing, observed in many neurons, is often attributed to ion channel or network level noise. Cortical cells during slow wave sleep exhibit transitions between so called Up and Down states. In this sleep state, with limited sensory stimuli, neurons fire in the Up state. Spontaneous firing is also observed in slices of cholinergic interneurons, cerebellar Purkinje cells and even brainstem inspiratory neurons. In such in vitro preparations, where the functional relevance is long lost, neurons continue to display a rich repertoire of firing properties. It is perplexing that these neurons, instead of saving their metabolic energy during information downtime and functional irrelevance, are eager to fire. We propose that spontaneous firing is not a chance event but instead, a vital activity for the well-being of a neuron. Neurons in anticipation of synaptic inputs, keep their ATP levels at maximum. As recovery from inputs requires most of the energy resources, neurons are ATP surplus and ADP scarce during synaptic quiescence. With ADP as the rate-limiting step, ATP production stalls in the mitochondria. This leads to toxic Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) formation, which are known to disrupt many cellular processes. We hypothesize that spontaneous firing occurs at these conditions as a release valve to spend energy and to restore ATP production, shielding against ROS . By linking a mitochondrial metabolism model to a conductance-based neuron model, we show that spontaneous firing depends on baseline ATP usage and on ATP -cost-per-spike. From our model, emerges a mitochondrial mediated homeostatic mechanism that provides a recipe for different firing patterns. Our findings, though mostly affecting intracellular dynamics, may have large knock-on effects on the nature of neural coding. Hitherto it has been thought that the neural code is optimised for energy minimisation, but this may be true only when neurons do not experience synaptic quiescence.

This talk is part of the Computational Neuroscience series.

This talk is included in these lists:

• All Talks (aka the CURE list)
• Biology
• Biology
• CBL important
• CamBridgeSens
• Cambridge Centre for Data-Driven Discovery (C2D3)
• Cambridge Neuroscience Seminars
• Cambridge talks
• Chris Davis' list
• Computational Neuroscience
• Computational and Biological Learning Seminar Series
• Featured lists
• Guy Emerson's list
• Hanchen DaDaDash
• Inference Group Journal Clubs
• Inference Group Summary
• Information Engineering Division seminar list
• Interested Talks
• Life Science
• Life Science Interface Seminars
• Life Sciences
• Life Sciences
• ME Seminar
• Neuroscience
• Neuroscience Seminars
• Neuroscience Seminars
• Online on Zoom
• Quantum Matter Journal Club
• Required lists for MLG
• Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine
• TQS Journal Clubs
• Trust & Technology Initiative - interesting events
• bld31
• custom
• dh539
• kt532's list
• my_list
• ndk22's list
• ob366-ai4er
• other talks
• rp587
• se456's list
• yk373's list

Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.