University of Cambridge > > Isaac Newton Institute Seminar Series > Assessing Measures of Order Flow Toxicity and Early Warning Signals for Market Turbulence

Assessing Measures of Order Flow Toxicity and Early Warning Signals for Market Turbulence

Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal

If you have a question about this talk, please contact Mustapha Amrani.

Systemic Risk: Mathematical Modelling and Interdisciplinary Approaches

Co-authors: Oleg Bondarenko (University of Illinois at Chicago), Maria Gonzalez-Perez (CUNEF, Madrid)

Following the much publicized “flash crash” in the U.S. financial markets on May 6, 2010, much work has been done in terms of developing reliable warning signals for impending market stress. However, this has met with limited success, except for one measure. The VPIN , or Volume-synchronized Probability of INformed trading, metric is introduced by Easley, Lopez de Prado and O’Hara (ELO) as a real-time indicator of order flow toxicity. They find the measure useful in predicting return volatility and conclude it, indeed, may help signal impending market turmoil. The VPIN metric involves decomposing volume into active buys and sells. We use the best-bid-offer (BBO) files from the CME Group to construct highly accurate trade classification measures for the E-mini S&P 500 futures contract. Against this benchmark, the ELO Bulk Volume Classification (BVC) scheme is inferior to a standard tick rule based on individual transactions. Moreover, when VPIN is constructed from an accurate classification, it behaves in a diametrically opposite way to BVC -VPIN. We also find the latter to have forecast power for volatility solely because it generates systematic classification errors that are correlated with trading volume and return volatility. Controlling for trading intensity and volatility, the BVC -VPIN measure has no incremental predictive power for future volatility. We conclude that VPIN is not suitable for capturing order flow toxicity or signaling ensuing market turbulence. In an extension, we also explore high-frequency VIX measures as real-time indicators of market stress. We find it critical to control for confounding effects in the computation of the index. In particular, during stressful periods, when a “fear gauge” is most needed, VIX is least reliable. As an alternative, we construct a real-time “corridor” VIX measure. We document that this index performs vastly better during stressful episodes like the financial crisis and the flash crash.

This talk is part of the Isaac Newton Institute Seminar Series series.

Tell a friend about this talk:

This talk is included in these lists:

Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.


© 2006-2024, University of Cambridge. Contact Us | Help and Documentation | Privacy and Publicity