University of Cambridge > > Theory of Condensed Matter > Is the theory of neutral evolution right?

Is the theory of neutral evolution right?

Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal

If you have a question about this talk, please contact Dr G Moller.

The neutral theory of evolution states that the vast majority of mutations are selectively neutral (they do not affect fitness). This was put forth three decades ago, and it remains the conventional view that nearly all mutations preserve phenotype. The fraction of mutations in a population that are neutral is the phenotype robustness r. Just how high can r be? We prove, using spectral graph theory, that the robustness r is severely limited by the size s of its underlying neutral network. It means that robust phenotypes must have vast neutral networks, and that high values of robustness may not be biologically possible. We confirm our result by exact enumeration of neutral networks for short sequences, by random sampling for longer sequences, and using data from RNA molecules and the genetic code.

This talk is part of the Theory of Condensed Matter series.

Tell a friend about this talk:

This talk is included in these lists:

Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.


© 2006-2023, University of Cambridge. Contact Us | Help and Documentation | Privacy and Publicity