COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Isaac Newton Institute Seminar Series > Estimating the heterogeneity distribution of willingness-to-pay using individualized choice sets
Estimating the heterogeneity distribution of willingness-to-pay using individualized choice setsAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Mustapha Amrani. Design and Analysis of Experiments Two prominent approaches exist nowadays for estimating the distribution of willingness-to-pay (WTP) based on choice experiments. One is to work in the usual preference space in which the random utility model is expressed in terms of partworths. These partworths or utility coefficients are estimated together with their distribution. The WTP and the corresponding heterogeneity distribution of WTP is derived from these results. The other approach reformulates the utility in terms of WTP (called WTP -space) and estimates the WTP and the heterogeneity distribution of WTP directly. Though often used, working in preference space has severe drawbacks as it often leads to WTP -distributions with long flat tails, infinite moments and therefore many extreme values. By moving to WTP -space, authors have tried to improve the estimation of WTP and its distribution from a modeling perspective. In this paper we will further improve the estimation of individual level WTP and corresponding heterogeneity distribution by designing the choice sets more efficiently. We will generate individual sequential choice designs in WTP space. The use of this sequential approach is motivated by findings of Yu et al. (2011) who show that this approach allows for superior estimation of the utility coefficients and their distribution. The key feature of this approach is that it uses Bayesian methods to generate individually optimized choice sets sequentially based on prior information of each individual which is further updated after each choice made. Based on a simulation study in which we compare the efficiency of this sequential design procedure with several non-sequential choice designs, we can conclude that the sequential approach improves the estimation results substantially. This talk is part of the Isaac Newton Institute Seminar Series series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsTalk by Gary Dymski: The Neoclassical Sink and the Heterodox Spiral: Why the Twin Global Crisis has not Transformed Economics CAMSED Cambridge Neuroscience SeminarsOther talksThe Digital Doctor: Hope, Hype, and Harm at the Dawn of Medicine’s Computer Age Babraham Lecture - Deciphering the gene regulation network in human germline cells at single-cell & single base resolution Human Brain Development Modelled in a Dish CANCELLED: The rise and fall of the Shopping Mall: dialogues on the relationship of commerce and city The MMHT view of the proton Mass Spectrometry The Anne McLaren Lecture: CRISPR-Cas Gene Editing: Biology, Technology and Ethics The Rise of Augmented Intelligence in Edge Networks Protein Folding, Evolution and Interactions Symposium Immigration and Freedom Constructing the organism in the age of abstraction |