University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Logic and Semantics Seminar (Computer Laboratory) > A topological proof of the H-colouring dichotomy

A topological proof of the H-colouring dichotomy

Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal

If you have a question about this talk, please contact Anuj Dawar.

A colouring of a graph with $k$ colours is an assignment of colours to vertices so that no edge is monochromatic. As it is well-known colouring with 2 colours is in P while colouring with $k > 2$ colours is NP-complete. This dichotomy was extended to the graph homomorphism problem, also called $H$-colouring, by Hell and Nešetřil [J. Comb. Theory B, 48(1):92-110, 1990]. More precisely, they proved that deciding whether there is a graph homomorphism from a given graph to a fixed graph $H$ is in P if $H$ is bipartite (or contains a self-loop), and is NP-complete otherwise. This dichotomy served as an important test-case for the Feder–Vardi dichotomy conjecture, and Bulatov–Zhuk dichotomy of complexity of finite-template CSPs.

In the talk, I will present a new proof of this theorem using tools from topological combinatorics based on ideas of Lovász [J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A, 25(3):319-324, 1978] and Brower’s fixed-point theorem. This is joint work with Sebastian Meyer (TU Dresden).

This talk is part of the Logic and Semantics Seminar (Computer Laboratory) series.

Tell a friend about this talk:

This talk is included in these lists:

Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.

 

© 2006-2025 Talks.cam, University of Cambridge. Contact Us | Help and Documentation | Privacy and Publicity