COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Isaac Newton Institute Seminar Series > Modelling competing Legal Arguments using Bayesian Model Comparison and Averaging
Modelling competing Legal Arguments using Bayesian Model Comparison and AveragingAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact INI IT. FOSW02 - Bayesian networks and argumentation in evidence analysis Bayesian models of legal arguments generally aim to produce a single integrated model, combining each of the legal arguments under consideration. This combined approach implicitly assumes that variables and their relationships can be represented without any contradiction or misalignment and in a way that makes sense with respect to the competing argument narratives. In contrast to this integrated approach, Non-Bayesian approaches to legal argumentation have tended to be narrative based and have focused on comparisons between competing stories and explanations. This paper describes a novel approach to compare and ‘average’ Bayesian models of legal arguments that have been built independently and with no attempt to make them consistent in terms of variables, causal assumptions or parameterization. The approach is consistent with subjectivist Bayesian philosophy. Practically, competing models of legal arguments are assessed by the extent to which the credibility of the sources of evidence are confirmed or disconfirmed in court. Those models that are more heavily disconfirmed are assigned lower weights, as model confidence measures, in the Bayesian model comparison and averaging approach adopted. In this way plurality of arguments are allowed yet a single judgement based on all arguments is possible and rational. This talk is part of the Isaac Newton Institute Seminar Series series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsCU Social Anthropology Society SBR Graduate Talks Dying Planet, Living Faith: Religious Contributions to Environmentalism The International Year of Statistics 2013 - Series of Public Lectures Slavonic Film and Media Studies Celebrating 40 years of women at TrinityOther talksShort-Selling Restrictions and Returns: a Natural Experiment International Snowballing and the Multi-Sited Research of Diplomats Human Brain Development Modelled in a Dish Superconformal quantum mechanics and integrability Making Smart Decisions in Systems Design: How to Engineer Decisions in a Connected World? |