![]() |
COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. | ![]() |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Isaac Newton Institute Seminar Series > What role is there, if any, for human-oriented automatic theorem proving today?
![]() What role is there, if any, for human-oriented automatic theorem proving today?Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact nobody. BPRW03 - Big proof: formalizing mathematics at scale Human-oriented theorem proving is the approach to automatic theorem proving that seeks to create algorithms that find proofs in a way that is modelled as closely as possible on how humans find them. It used to be contrasted with machine-oriented theorem proving, where the emphasis was far more on exploiting to the full the vastly superior speed and memory of computers. At the last Big Proof meeting I argued that despite the fact that the machine-oriented approach was more fashionable, it was important not to lose sight of the human-oriented approach. Since that meeting, the whole discussion has been greatly changed by the dramatic developments in AI. I shall argue, but more tentatively, that it is still worth investing significant effort into understanding how human mathematicians find proofs. I shall also report on some of the work my group in Cambridge has been doing in that direction. This talk is part of the Isaac Newton Institute Seminar Series series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsRSE Seminars Type the title of a new list here rp587Other talksAdditive Density-on-Scalar Regression in Bayes Hilbert Spaces Normalisation, adaptation, and the balance of excitation and inhibition Dr John James, Immunology, Warwick Medical School. Warwick Medical School Unravelling the complexity of root stem cell niche regulation through multi-scale models Informal to formal and back with LLMs |