University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > DAMTP Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics > Energetic signatures of tropical rainband biases & shifts in CMIP6

Energetic signatures of tropical rainband biases & shifts in CMIP6

Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal

If you have a question about this talk, please contact Alison Ming.

Tropical and subtropical precipitation impact millions of people via agriculture and rainfall-driven disasters, driving interest in their potential future change. CMIP6 simulations broadly predict an increase in global monsoon precipitation. However, regional projections from individual models vary in magnitude and sign, and projected changes by the end of the century are often small compared with model biases. This motivates an interest in understanding model biases, and how to interpret the future shifts in rainfall.

The Hadley and Walker circulations transport Moist Static Energy (MSE, the combination of the parcels enthalpy, potential energy and latent heat content) in the direction of their upper branches, so that the change in sign of MSE transport acts as a proxy for mass convergence in the tropical rainband. MSE transport can then be interpreted in terms of top-of-atmosphere and surface energy fluxes using the column energy budget.

Recent work attributes contributions to annual- and zonal-mean divergent MSE transport to radiative fluxes, evaporative fluxes and sensible heat, and suggests that evaporative fluxes are key in setting the spatial structure of MSE transport. Here we extend this approach to regional and seasonal scales, and explore inter-model differences in CMIP6 historical simulations, and projected changes under SSP585 .

MSE transport attributed to evaporative and radiative fluxes dominate the regional JJA & DJF transport. Empirical Orthogonal Functions (EOFs) are used to express historical intermodel differences in MSE transport in a 2-dimensional space of leading EOFs linked to land-sea thermal contrast (38.2% of variance) and interhemispheric thermal contrast (30.1% of variance). The contributions from the different fluxes to intermodel MSE differences and changes under SSP585 are then projected into this space. This reveals energetic signatures of model bias and future change, that illustrate how different processes contribute to the overall differences in energy transport.

Shared energetic signatures of bias are predominantly seen within model families. In contrast, shared signatures of future change emerge across (and differ within) model families, with a shared bias signature not implying a shared change signature. This suggests a set coherent but differing pathways through which climate change affects the energy budget and associated tropical rainfall in particular groups of models.

This talk is part of the DAMTP Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics series.

Tell a friend about this talk:

This talk is included in these lists:

Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.

 

© 2006-2024 Talks.cam, University of Cambridge. Contact Us | Help and Documentation | Privacy and Publicity