COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Isaac Newton Institute Seminar Series > Verifying Peephole Rewriting In SSA Compiler IRs
Verifying Peephole Rewriting In SSA Compiler IRsAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact nobody. BSPW01 - Big Specification: Specification, Proof, and Testing at Scale There is an increasing need for domain-specific reasoning in modern compilers. This has fueled the use of tailored intermediate representations (IRs) based on static single assignment (SSA), like in the MLIR compiler framework. Interactive theorem provers (ITPs) provide strong guarantees for the end-to-end verification of compilers (e.g., CompCert). However, modern compilers and their IRs evolve at a rate that makes proof engineering alongside them prohibitively expensive. Nevertheless, well-scoped push-button automated verification tools such as the Alive peephole verifier for LLVM -IR gained recognition in domains where SMT solvers offer efficient (semi) decision procedures. In this paper, we aim to combine the convenience of automation with the versatility of ITPs for verifying peephole rewrites across domain-specific IRs. We formalize a core calculus for SSA -based IRs that is generic over the IR and covers so-called regions (nested scoping used by many domain-specific IRs in the MLIR ecosystem). Our mechanization in the Lean proof assistant provides a user-friendly frontend for translating MLIR syntax into our calculus. We provide scaffolding for defining and verifying peephole rewrites, offering tactics to eliminate the abstraction overhead of our SSA calculus. We prove correctness theorems about peephole rewriting, as well as two classical program transformations. To evaluate our framework, we consider three use cases from the MLIR ecosystem that cover different levels of abstractions: (1) bitvector rewrites from LLVM , (2) structured control flow, and (3) fully homomorphic encryption. Our mechanization provides a foundation for formally verified rewrites on new domain-specific IRs and has fueled recent advances in bitvector reasoning in the lean interactive theorem prover, which I will share a recent update on. This talk is part of the Isaac Newton Institute Seminar Series series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other liststhehealthcareguardian Sir David Khalili's 'The Art of Peace' Lecture Intellectual ForumOther talksJCTS Presentations Varieties of minimal rational tangents and associated geometric substructures. Isomonodromic Deformations and Tau Functions Seminars in Cancer Random Cell Migration on Linear Tracks and Networks Formal Dinner at Selwyn College |