Wishful speaking: science, truth and dictatorship
Add to your list(s)
Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact .
In 1948 a meeting at the Lenin Academy of Agricultural Sciences decided
that Michurinism – an account of epigenetic inheritance more commonly
known as Lysenkoism – was preferable to Mendelianism, with significant
implications for teaching and research. Many treat the Lysenko affair as
a paradigmatic example of how politics and science should not relate.
How, though, should we characterise this case, given recent claims that
scientific justification cannot or should not be “value-free”? This
paper investigates these issues, arguing that concerns over “wishful
speaking” – rather than the more familiar “wishful thinking” – should be
central to our thinking about the proper relationship between political
institutions and scientific practice.
This talk is part of the CamPoS (Cambridge Philosophy of Science) seminar series.
This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.
|