Nomic truth approximation by revising models and postulates in the light of increasing evidence
Add to your list(s)
Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Christopher Clarke.
The qualitative theory of nomic truth approximation, presented by Kuipers (2000), in which ‘the truth’ concerns the distinction between nomic, e.g.
physical, possibilities and impossibilities, rests on a very restrictive assumption. This paper drops this assumption by fully recognizing two different functions of theories: excluding impossibilities and representing possibilities. Accordingly, theories are conceived of as tuples of postulates and models, where the postulates claim to exclude nomic
impossibilities and the (not-excluded) models claim to represent nomic possibilities. Revising theories aiming at truth approximation becomes then a matter of adding or revising models and/or postulates in the light of increasing evidence. Here, truth approximation is defined as a matter of increasing truth content and decreasing falsity content.
This talk is part of the CamPoS (Cambridge Philosophy of Science) seminar series.
This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.
|