University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Social Psychology Seminar Series (SPSS) > When Curiosity Gaps Backfire: Effects of Headline Concreteness on Information Selection Decisions

When Curiosity Gaps Backfire: Effects of Headline Concreteness on Information Selection Decisions

Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal

If you have a question about this talk, please contact Yara Kyrychenko.

Journalists often use curiosity-inducing tactics in headlines to maximally appeal to readers, yet studies do not consistently show that clickbait techniques yield more engagement. In this talk, I tie headline strategies back to psychological theories about the information gap — the belief that curiosity is piqued when people are made aware of a gap in their knowledge. I introduce the Upworthy Research Archive, a large-scale corpus of A/B-tested news headlines that enables testing the causal effect of linguistics cues on reader behavior. By modeling the amount of information conveyed in a headline using an automated measured of sentence concreteness, I show that that there can be too much, or too little, information conveyed in a headline. I argue that computer scientists and communication scholars should rethink the binary nature of clickbait headlines in light of these findings.

Teams Meeting ID: 329 287 585 675 Passcode: yKwfhf

This talk is part of the Social Psychology Seminar Series (SPSS) series.

Tell a friend about this talk:

This talk is included in these lists:

Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.

 

© 2006-2024 Talks.cam, University of Cambridge. Contact Us | Help and Documentation | Privacy and Publicity