COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > C.U. Ethics in Mathematics Society (CUEiMS) > Ethics for the working mathematician, discussion 4: Fairness and impartiality in algorithms and AI
Ethics for the working mathematician, discussion 4: Fairness and impartiality in algorithms and AIAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Artem Khovanov. Algorithms run the world, and mathematicians are designing them. Algorithms decide what people read, what they buy, and when then can get a loan. We often design these systems to remove human subjectivity from decision making processes and to make them impartial, as is being done with predictive policing algorithms and prison sentencing algorithms. But how impartial, or fair, can a system designed by humans ever be? Moreover, the internet and big data have given rise to massive new potential, from targeted political advertising as done by Cambridge Analytica, to AI technology such as deepfake videos and self-driving cars. Our ‘solutions’ in these instances can bring about a whole new set of problems. For more information about this series of discussions, please see https://cueims.soc.srcf.net/2021. This talk is part of the C.U. Ethics in Mathematics Society (CUEiMS) series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsAnglia Ruskin University - Community Engagement IT Certifications Centre for Environment Energy and Natural resource Governance (C-EENRG) Seminar SeriesOther talksEthics for the working mathematician, discussion 3: Cryptography, surveillance and privacy Role of astrocytes in CNS inflammation Ethics for the working mathematician, discussion 6: Understanding the behaviour of the mathematical community Ab Initio Theory of Exciton Transport from the Ballistic to Diffusive Regimes Democracy and Representation in Early Modern England, 1531–1653 Can we nudge to zero? Promises and pitfalls of behavioural insights-based climate policies |