COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > ARClub Talks > Pragmatic me, pragmatic you: the development of informativeness from a speaker's and a comprehender's perspective
Pragmatic me, pragmatic you: the development of informativeness from a speaker's and a comprehender's perspectiveAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Bhismadev Chakrabarti. It’s not enough to tell the truth, if it is not the whole truth. But how do young children come to master this conversational principle? One way of looking into this question is by studying whether children reject other people’s utterances that contain only some of the information that they could have communicated. Another way of looking into this question is by studying whether children themselves give all the information that they should give. These two paradigms address the twin aspects of the same pragmatic skill, informativeness, that is, the ability to estimate how much information should be communicated in a situation, from a comprehender’s and a speaker’s perspective respectively. To the best of our knowledge, the two aspects of informativeness have not been investigated in combination, and their developmental trajectory is not established. We present a number of studies that look into both aspects of informativeness within the same population of 5-, 7-, 9-, and 11-year old typically-developing English-speaking children, as well as an adult control group. In this presentation we will pay particular attention to cases where partial information is given (a) in circumstances of knowledge of the outcome, in which case partial information is indeed under-informative, and (b) in circumstances of uncertainty and ignorance (as when one makes a bet or a guess when they do not know the outcome of a story). We will see that participants do take the knowledge state of the interlocutor into account when judging if an utterance is under-informative or not. We will explore the implications of this research for investigations into populations with a language and/or a theory-of-mind deficit. This talk is part of the ARClub Talks series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsThe International Year of Statistics 2013 - Series of Public Lectures Machine Learning Horizon Forum: The Cell-Materials InterfaceOther talksGlucagon like peptide-1 receptor - a possible role for beta cell physiology in susceptibility to autoimmune diabetes Enhancing the Brain and Wellbeing in Health and Disease Cosmological Probes of Light Relics A domain-decomposition-based model reduction method for convection-diffusion equations with random coefficients Polynomial approximation of high-dimensional functions on irregular domains "The integrated stress response – a double edged sword in skeletal development and disease" The Gopakumar-Vafa conjecture for symplectic manifolds The Partition of India and Migration Sustainability of livestock production: water, welfare and woodland What quantum computers tell us about physics (even if no one ever builds one!) |