COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Rainbow Group Seminars > Accommodation and Comfort in Head-Mounted Displays
Accommodation and Comfort in Head-Mounted DisplaysAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Alexander Simpson. Head-mounted displays (HMDs) often cause discomfort and even nausea. Improving comfort is therefore one of the most significant challenges for the design of such systems. In this paper, we evaluate the effect of different HMD display configurations on discomfort. We do this by designing a device to measure human visual behavior and evaluate viewer comfort. In particular, we focus on one known source of discomfort: the vergence-accommodation (VA) conflict. The VA conflict is the difference between accommodative and vergence response. In HMDs the eyes accommodate to a fixed screen distance while they converge to the simulated distance of the object of interest, requiring the viewer to undo the neural coupling between the two responses. Several methods have been proposed to alleviate the VA conflict, including Depth-of-Field (DoF) rendering, focus-adjustable lenses, and monovision. However, no previous work has investigated whether these solutions actually drive accommodation to the distance of the simulated object. If they did, the VA conflict would disappear, and we expect comfort to improve. We design the first device that allows us to measure accommodation in HMDs, and we use it to obtain accommodation measurements and to conduct a discomfort study. The results of the first experiment demonstrate that only the focus-adjustable-lens design drives accommodation effectively, while other solutions do not drive accommodation to the simulated distance and thus do not resolve the VA conflict. The second experiment measures discomfort. The results validate that the focus-adjustable-lens design improves comfort significantly more than the other solutions. This talk is part of the Rainbow Group Seminars series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsSir Andrew Motion Visits Cambridge in War Poets Event Type the title of a new list here Pragmatics reading group 2012-13Other talksInelastic neutron scattering and µSR investigations of an anisotropic hybridization gap in the Kondo insulators: CeT2Al10 (T=Fe, Ru and Os) Prof Chris Rapley (UCL): Polar Climates Lunchtime Talk: Helen's Bedroom Modeling and understanding of Quaternary climate cycles Lua: designing a language to be embeddable |