|COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring.|
Spinoza on law and sovereignty
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Lauren Kassell.
There’s a moment in the history of early modern philosophy when the idea that humans are subject to the commands of God is challenged and rejected. Can we locate it? Perhaps the earliest philosopher who wholeheartedly gives up this orthodox view is Benedict Spinoza. In this paper I examine Spinoza’s wide-ranging argument for his claim that all laws, in the sense of commands, are made and imposed by human beings rather than by the deity. I show how he defends this conclusion by embedding it in his wider metaphysics and politics. I go on to examine some consequences of this move, concentrating on the instabilities it produces in Spinoza’s distinction between reason and imagination.
This talk is part of the Departmental Seminars in History and Philosophy of Science series.
This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.
Other listsGeometry in Science Cambridge Centre for Analysis talks Semantics Lunch (Computer Laboratory)
Other talksInnate lymphoid cells in immunity and disease Cambridge Assessment Network: Validity and the value of educational assessments PLACE Research Group Book Launch The Immunology of a successful pregnancy Geoff Mulgan: 'Big ideas and little evidence? Reflections on thinktanks of the past, present and future' Mesoscopic Solar Cells And Solar Fuels