|COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring.|
Spinoza on law and sovereignty
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Lauren Kassell.
There’s a moment in the history of early modern philosophy when the idea that humans are subject to the commands of God is challenged and rejected. Can we locate it? Perhaps the earliest philosopher who wholeheartedly gives up this orthodox view is Benedict Spinoza. In this paper I examine Spinoza’s wide-ranging argument for his claim that all laws, in the sense of commands, are made and imposed by human beings rather than by the deity. I show how he defends this conclusion by embedding it in his wider metaphysics and politics. I go on to examine some consequences of this move, concentrating on the instabilities it produces in Spinoza’s distinction between reason and imagination.
This talk is part of the Departmental Seminars in History and Philosophy of Science series.
This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.
Other listsRCEAL occasional seminars Engineering Without Borders Cambridge Commercialisation Seminar Series
Other talksLunchtime Talk: Helen's Bedroom Lies, Damn'd lies and statistics: why it is (almost) impossible to communicate risk ethically How does recent linguistic experience result in a retuning of lexical-semantic representations? Producing Smart Pareto Sets for Multi-Objective Topology Optimisation Problems De-identified electronic mental health records for research and recruitment Wonderwalls: Ovid’s Metamorphoses in art