|COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring.|
Spinoza on law and sovereignty
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Lauren Kassell.
There’s a moment in the history of early modern philosophy when the idea that humans are subject to the commands of God is challenged and rejected. Can we locate it? Perhaps the earliest philosopher who wholeheartedly gives up this orthodox view is Benedict Spinoza. In this paper I examine Spinoza’s wide-ranging argument for his claim that all laws, in the sense of commands, are made and imposed by human beings rather than by the deity. I show how he defends this conclusion by embedding it in his wider metaphysics and politics. I go on to examine some consequences of this move, concentrating on the instabilities it produces in Spinoza’s distinction between reason and imagination.
This talk is part of the Departmental Seminars in History and Philosophy of Science series.
This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.
Other listsSpecial Seminar Cambridge University International Development Society Centenary Year of the Medical Research Council and International Year of Statistics
Other talksModelling the Risks of Climate Change - Dr. Chris Hope Triceps tendon rupture in dogs and cats: A retrospective study of 14 cases "From fragments to target-selective ligands by reaction-driven de novo design" Epigenetics and microRNA The effects of N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA) and N-acetyl-aspartyl-glutamate (NAAG) on oligodendrocyte precursor cells Lessons in innate immunity taught by a virus