|COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring.|
Spinoza on law and sovereignty
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Lauren Kassell.
There’s a moment in the history of early modern philosophy when the idea that humans are subject to the commands of God is challenged and rejected. Can we locate it? Perhaps the earliest philosopher who wholeheartedly gives up this orthodox view is Benedict Spinoza. In this paper I examine Spinoza’s wide-ranging argument for his claim that all laws, in the sense of commands, are made and imposed by human beings rather than by the deity. I show how he defends this conclusion by embedding it in his wider metaphysics and politics. I go on to examine some consequences of this move, concentrating on the instabilities it produces in Spinoza’s distinction between reason and imagination.
This talk is part of the Departmental Seminars in History and Philosophy of Science series.
This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.
Other listsThe Validity Symposia Wellcome Lecture in the History of Medicine Modern Irish History Seminar
Other talksGroup Discussions (Isaac Newton Institute & Centre for Mathematical Sciences) Title: ‘Brewing Pints for the NHS - Transfusion for the 21st century’ The Power Switch; How Power is Changing in a Networked World - an international symposium Challenging bariatric care practices and fat stigma in ICU Sperm Donation and Motherhood: British and French perspectives Defining “Good” in “Good Energy Policy”: Insights from Theologies and Religions