|COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring.|
A few lessons that I learnt about interprocedural program analyses
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Jonathan Hayman.
Handling procedures effectively is one of the most basic problems in static program analyses. A good method for analysing procedures can improve the precision and performance of a static analysis substantially. However, obtaining such a method is nontrivial and requires new insights into the type of the analysis and target programs.
In this talk, I will describe a few lessons that I recently learnt about interprocedural program analyses, while working with colleagues in the US and Korea. We found a new relationship between popular approaches for analysing procedures, which helped us to form a big picture about these approaches. We also came up with new ways of combining or adjusting existing interprocedural analyses, which led to the improvement in precision or performance in our experiments. I will explain these findings.
This is joint work with Mayur Naik, Ravi Mangal, Xin Zhang in Georgia Tech and Wonchan Lee, Hakjoo Oh, Kwangkeun Yi in Seoul National University.
This talk is part of the Logic and Semantics Seminar (Computer Laboratory) series.
This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.
Other listsCBL important Computer Science Careers Events Social Mobility: Chavs, NEETs and McJobs
Other talksDe-identified electronic mental health records for research and recruitment “Creating New In-Roads for Cancer-Specific T Cells” Carving Romanesque Chiaroscuro DataSHIELD: taking the analysis to the data not the data to the analysis A Personal Odyssey Amongst Trypanosomes, Scientists and Biological Questions Molecular characterization of the Flagellar Pocket Collar cytoskeletal of the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma brucei