COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Cambridge Finance Workshop Series > Incidence Analysis of the Restoration and Hanoverian Excise: Assessing Contemporary Claims for Back Shifting, Forward Shifting and Substitution Effects
Incidence Analysis of the Restoration and Hanoverian Excise: Assessing Contemporary Claims for Back Shifting, Forward Shifting and Substitution EffectsAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Mette Jamasb. Since Edwin Seligman (The Shifting and Incidence of Taxation, 1899), fiscal historians have known that eighteenth-century English economic writings contained a diversity of opinion about the probable economic incidence of indirect taxation, particularly the excise on beer and ale. For contemporaries, the stakes were high. The excise (an unpopular and contentious tax) accounted for about a quarter of the total public revenue of Great Britain. According to Gregory King (1695), households spent more on beer and ale than any other single item, and a significant portion of the agricultural produce of the kingdom was consumed in its production (Mathias, 1959 [1992]). For modern economic historians, accurate measurement of the economic incidence of the excise would permit meaningful comparison of the relative fiscal capacities of the British and French states (Mathias and O’Brien, 1976; 1978; McCloskey, 1978). More importantly, without accurate measurements of incidence, it is impossible to assess the effects of the tax on industrialization of the brewing industry and on the organization of eighteenth-century British agriculture. Thirty years ago, when the question was first floated, economic historians lacked both the methodological tools and the necessary price and wage data to perform even rudimentary partial incidence analysis. Inspired by Mark Spoerer’s successful resolution of the Laspeyres-Paradox (2008), this paper performs a historical analysis of incidence and attempts to measure the effects of the tax on the organization of the brewing industry. My results show statistically significant ‘forward shifting’ at ordinary levels of the duty. Limited ‘back shifting’ is evident only at extraordinary duty levels. Substitution effects do not appear significant. The author would welcome suggestions for refinement of the models used to assess the effects on the brewing industry. This talk is part of the Cambridge Finance Workshop Series series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsmy_list FERSA - All Events Centre Family Research/PsychOther talksAn SU(3) variant of instanton homology for webs A unifying theory of branching morphogenesis Future directions panel Psychological predictors of risky online behaviour: The cases of online piracy and privacy Babraham Lecture - Understanding how the p53 onco-suppressor gene works: hints from the P2X7 ATP receptor Magnetic van der Waals Materials: Potentials and Applications Single Cell Seminars (September) Symplectic topology of K3 surfaces via mirror symmetry The Anne McLaren Lecture: CRISPR-Cas Gene Editing: Biology, Technology and Ethics The role of the oculomotor system in visual attention and visual short-term memory Mathematical applications of little string theory Arithmetic and Dynamics on Markoff-Hurwitz Varieties |