COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Geometric Group Theory (GGT) Seminar > Approximate actions and Ulam stability
Approximate actions and Ulam stabilityAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact . Given two permutations A and B in Sym(n) such that AB and BA are almost equal, are there A’ and B’ in Sym(n) such that A is close to A’, B is close to B’, and A’B’=B’A’? Arzhantseva and Paunescu formalized this question and gave an affirmative answer: “Nearly commuting permutations are near commuting permutations”. Equivalently, approximate actions of the group Z2 on finite sets are close to genuine actions, i.e., Z2 is stable (in permutations). I will discuss the more general problem: Which finitely generated groups are stable? This will bring into the picture notions such as Property (T), amenability, invariant random subgroups, sofic groups and property testing. The talk is based on joint works with Alex Lubotzky, Andreas Thom and Jonathan Mosheiff. This talk is part of the Geometric Group Theory (GGT) Seminar series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsCMIH Imaging Clinic Oxbridge PDE conference srgOther talksResearch and development of new vibro-acoustic methods in the commerical software wave6 A Preliminary Simulation of Convections and Airflows Using An Unstructured Adaptive Mesh Finite-Element Model Fluidity-Atmosphere Thalamic Calcium waves regulate the development & plasticity of sensory cortical maps Adapting _The Waves_ into performance. Higher-order influence function Welcome and Introduction |