COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Wednesday Lunch Time Seminar Series > The configural processing hypothesis revisited: The role of shape and reflectance in familiar face recognition
The configural processing hypothesis revisited: The role of shape and reflectance in familiar face recognitionAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Mandy Carter. Face recognition is often believed to be based on some sort of ‘‘configural’’ or ‘‘holistic’’ processing. Although these terms are often not well defined in the literature, an influential hypothesis is that the recognition of individual faces depends, to a considerable extent, on shape in terms of metric distances between features – so-called “second-order configural information”. Here I will argue that this popular idea is in striking contrast to a number of recent empirical findings, and therefore is not only simplistic, but also wrong. First, I will show evidence that familiar faces are well recognized even when idiosyncratic shape has been eliminated by shape normalization – suggesting a strong role of surface reflectance/texture information for recognition. I will then present several face learning experiments that examined the impact of selective photorealistic caricaturing of either shape or reflectance information on face recognition, and on its neuronal correlates in event-related brain potentials. These experiments confirm that shape is of little importance for the recognition of familiar faces, whereas shape enhancement can facilitate the encoding of new faces. Moreover, distinctive reflectance information was found to be particularly important for the recognition of learned faces. Overall, the present experiments underline the importance of face familiarity for mental representations of faces. The configural processing hypothesis in its traditional form does not well account for the findings reported, and thus needs to be reconsidered. This talk is part of the Wednesday Lunch Time Seminar Series series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsCambridge Clinical Research Centre for Affective Disorders (C2:AD) Surface, Microstructure & Fracture group Postdoc Career Workshops Cambridge Food Security Forum Martin Centre Research Seminar Series - 43rd Annual Series of Lunchtime Lectures Computer Laboratory Research Students' Lectures 2014Other talksThe Productivity Paradox: are we too busy to get anything done? An investigation into hepatocyte expression and prognostic significance of senescence marker p21 in canine chronic hepatitis Political Thought, Time and History: An International Conference Graph Convolutional Networks for Natural Language Processing and Relational Modeling Migration in Science Structural basis for human mitochondrial DNA replication, repair and antiviral drug toxicity Asclepiadaceae An SU(3) variant of instanton homology for webs How to Deploy Psychometrics Successfully in an Organisation Unbiased Estimation of the Eigenvalues of Large Implicit Matrices Making Refuge: Academics at Risk |