University of Cambridge > > Cambridge Psychometrics Centre Seminars > State of the art in psychometric modelling of forced-choice questionnaire data

State of the art in psychometric modelling of forced-choice questionnaire data

Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal

If you have a question about this talk, please contact Luning Sun.

Presenting questionnaire items in comparative formats can reduce common response sets and biases. These formats require respondents select most attractive out of two stimuli, or arrange a larger number of stimuli in order of attractiveness, either fully or partially. Until recently, basic classical scoring methods were applied to this kind of data, generally leading to scores relative to the person’s mean (ipsative scores). Recent advances in estimation methods have enabled rapid development of IRT models for forced-choice questionnaires that overcome problems of ipsative data. In this talk, a unified framework for modelling comparative data is provided. It is shown that different preference mechanisms, and different models for absolute judgement (i.e. dominance or ideal-point models) can be accomodated under this framework. Finally, the Thurstonian IRT model (Brown & Maydeu-Olivares, 2011) is described that allows flexible modelling and scoring of forced-choice questionnaires in practice.

This talk is part of the Cambridge Psychometrics Centre Seminars series.

Tell a friend about this talk:

This talk is included in these lists:

Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.


© 2006-2024, University of Cambridge. Contact Us | Help and Documentation | Privacy and Publicity