COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
Impact InvestingAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact CERF/CF Admin. We document that investors derive nonpecuniary utility from investing in dual-objective venture/growth equity funds, thus sacrificing financial returns. In reduced form, impact funds earn 4.7% lower IRRs compared to traditional VC funds. Likewise, random utility/willingness-to-pay (WTP) models of investment choice indicate investors accept 3.4% lower IRRs for impact funds. We rule out alternative interpretations of risk, liquidity, and naiveté. Development organizations, banks, public pensions, Europeans, and UNPRI signatories have high WTP ; endowments and private pensions have none. Mission-oriented objectives and local political pressure increase WTP ; legal restrictions (e.g., ERISA ) decrease WTP . This talk is part of the Cambridge Finance Workshop Series series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsEconomics Science & Music Theoretical Physics ColloquiumOther talksSolving the Reproducibility Crisis Will you fade? Will you perish? Virginia Woolf and the art of still life Rooms of their Own: Virginia Woolf, Vita Sackville-West and Eddy Sackville-West Sustainability through environmental liability: getting conservationists and political ecologists into the courtroom |