COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Social Psychology Seminar Series (SPSS) > How Do Mindreaders Model Minds?
How Do Mindreaders Model Minds?Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Nik Darshane. Is belief ascription automatic? Some findings suggest that it is, others that it is not. Can infants ascribe false beliefs? Some measures indicate that they can, others that they cannot. Reflection on these and other puzzling patterns of findings suggests that we might usefully ask, What it is to ascribe beliefs? More generally, What it is to be a mindreader? Mindreading involves representing mental states. And just as representing physical states requires having some model of the physical, so equally representing mental states requires having some model of the mental. Now the history of science makes it plain that there are multiple models of the physical; some models are relatively easy to apply but are limited in accuracy or scope, others are more accurate but also harder to use. My talk starts from the observation that there are also multiple models of the mental. To say that someone represents beliefs or other mental states leaves open the question of which model of the mental she is using. By outlining how to construct a minimal theory of mind, I shall show that there are simple but limited models of the mental. Perhaps, then, mindreading sometimes involves simple but limited models of the mind. This might contribute to resolving puzzles about automaticity and development. But how could hypotheses about which model a mindreader is using be tested? Different models have different signature limits, and these limits may make it possible to identify the operation of a given model across contexts and across types of subject. These limits generate predictions, making it possible to test the conjecture that mindreading involves not only multiple systems but also multiple models of the mind. This talk is part of the Social Psychology Seminar Series (SPSS) series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsChemical Engineering and Biotechnology Departmental Seminars Peterhouse Theory Group The Marshall Society Cambridge Climate Vertical Readings in Dante's 'Comedy' Self Leadership&Self ManagementOther talksKnot Floer homology and algebraic methods Beacon Salon # 8 The Dawn of the Antibiotic Age Description: TIE proteins: chemical harpoons of Gram-positive bacteria Cambridge-Lausanne Workshop 2018 - Day 2 Visual Analytics for High-Dimensional Data Exploration and Engineering Design 70th Anniversary Celebration Constructing the virtual fundamental cycle 'Cambridge University, Past and Present' Cyclic Peptides: Building Blocks for Supramolecular Designs No interpretation of probability |