|COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring.|
Caveat coercitor: towards coercion-evident elections
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Wei Ming Khoo.
It has proved very difficult, and is perhaps impossible, to design an electronic voting system which satisfies the three desired properties of voter-incoercibility, results-verifiability, and usability. Therefore, we have looked at forgoing incoercibility, and replacing it with “coercion evidence”—after an election, it will be possible for observers to see how much coercion has taken place, and therefore whether the results constitute a mandate for the winner. The system we describe is intended to be practical to use.
The talk will include an introduction to the concerns and issues of electronic voting, as well as a brief survey of existing systems. The body of the talk ongoing, unpublished work. I will welcome comments during and after the seminar.
This talk is part of the Computer Laboratory Security Seminar series.
This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.
Other listsBullard Laboratories Wednesday Colloquia CamLing 2010 -- The Sixth Cambridge Postgraduate Conference in Language Research Speech Seminars
Other talksCredit Ratings and Security Design Efficient Advert Assignment Algorithmic Approaches to Statistical Estimation under Structural Constraints 'Global Population: History, Geopolitics and Life on Earth' Principles of Functional Craniology in Paleoneurology and Evolutionary Neuroanatomy CGHR film screening: We Are Many, followed by a Q&A with Producer-Director Amir Amirani