|COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring.|
Caveat coercitor: towards coercion-evident elections
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Wei Ming Khoo.
It has proved very difficult, and is perhaps impossible, to design an electronic voting system which satisfies the three desired properties of voter-incoercibility, results-verifiability, and usability. Therefore, we have looked at forgoing incoercibility, and replacing it with “coercion evidence”—after an election, it will be possible for observers to see how much coercion has taken place, and therefore whether the results constitute a mandate for the winner. The system we describe is intended to be practical to use.
The talk will include an introduction to the concerns and issues of electronic voting, as well as a brief survey of existing systems. The body of the talk ongoing, unpublished work. I will welcome comments during and after the seminar.
This talk is part of the Computer Laboratory Security Seminar series.
This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.
Other listsData Insights Cambridge Talks at Centre of Molecular Materials for Photonics and Electronics (CMMPE) Pilot waves, Bohmian metaphysics, and the foundations of quantum mechanics
Other talksAdapting Cities and Their Infrastructure to Global Change: An Integrated Modelling Approach to Understand Risks and Tradeoffs Defining Autism Since 1979: The Sciences of Social Impairment CERF Cavalcade 2015 Illuminating the lumen: endothelial calcium in both vasoconstriction and vasodilation Environmental effects of sulfur emitted by large-scale flood lava eruptions Production Processes Group Seminar