COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Materials Chemistry Research Interest Group > Discovering New Materials By Combining Computation And Intelligent Mobile Robotic Chemists
Discovering New Materials By Combining Computation And Intelligent Mobile Robotic ChemistsAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Sharon Connor. Today, many functional crystalline solids are designed using concepts that echo engineering. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are an archetype:1 they can be built to order because the metal nodes and organic linkers assemble in an intuitive fashion. This is molecular Lego: the molecular bricks stick together in a predictable way. However, this Lego analogy is simplistic, even for MOFs, and it barely applies to molecular crystals, which make up more than 90% of the >1,000,000 entries in the Cambridge Structural Database of organic and organometallic crystal structures. Molecular crystals pose big problems for the purposeful design of function.2 This is because the energy landscape for molecular crystals is typically not dominated by a single intermolecular interaction. Hence, molecular crystal engineering has so far failed to become the “new organic synthesis” that was envisaged.3 This lecture will focus on the design and synthesis of new functional organic crystals using computationally-led approaches.4 In particular, I will discuss a new approach for designing function in molecular crystals, based on knowledge of the building blocks alone, by constructing energy–structure–function maps.5 I will also outline our vision for the direct integration of materials properties predictions with mobile laboratory robots, thus allowing the autonomous discovery of materials with properties that would be hard to access by more conventional methods.6 References O. M. Yaghi, et al., Nature, 2003, 423, 705. M. Jansen and J. C. Schön, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 3406. G. R. Desiraju, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1995, 34, 2311. (a) J. T. A. Jones, et al., Nature, 2011, 474, 367; (b) T. Mitra, et al., Nature Chem., 2013, 5, 247; (c) E. O. Pyzer-Knapp, et al., Chem. Sci., 2014, 5, 2235; (d) L. Chen, et al., Nature Mater., 2014, 13, 954; (e) M. A. Little, M. A., et al., Nature Chem., 2015, 7, 153; (f) A. G. Slater, et al., Nature Chem., 2016, 9, 17; (g) R. L. Greenaway, et al., Nature Commun., 2018, 9, 2849. (i) A. Pulido, et al., Nature, 2017, 543, 657; (ii) G. M. Day and A. I. Cooper, Adv. Mater. 2017, 1704944 B. Burger et al., Nature, 2020, 583, 237. We thank EPSRC (EP/N004884/1, EP/H000925/1 & EP/K018396/1), the European Research Council (project ADAM ) and the Leverhulme Trust for funding. This talk is part of the Materials Chemistry Research Interest Group series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsJohn Harrison and the solution of the Longitude problem Three-dimensional cell culture: Innovations in tissue scaffolds and biomimetic systems RECOUP SeminarsOther talksFeedforward and feedback interactions during prediction and attention BSU Seminar: "Statistical approaches for differential analyses on transcriptomics data" TBC The ubiquitous acoustic bubble: a brief introduction Discovering the gene networks that regulate hunger Are we alone in the Universe? |