COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |

University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Semantics Lunch (Computer Laboratory) > Resolving inductive definitions with binders

## Resolving inductive definitions with bindersAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal - Matt Lakin (University of Cambridge)
- Monday 09 March 2009, 12:45-14:00
- Room FW26, Computer Laboratory, William Gates Building.
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Sam Staton. We study inductive definitions involving binders, in which aliasing between free and bound names is permitted. Such aliasing occurs in informal specifications of operational semantics, but is excluded by the common representation of binding as meta-level lambda-abstraction. Drawing upon ideas from functional logic programming, we represent such definitions with aliasing as recursively defined functions in a higher-order typed functional programming language that extends core ML with types for name-binding, a type of “semi-decidable propositions” and existential quantification for types with decidable equality. We show that the representation is sound and complete with respect to the language’s operational semantics, which combines the use of evaluation contexts with constraint programming. We briefly discuss the associated constraint problem, which is NP-complete, and outline a constraint solving algorithm. This talk is part of the Semantics Lunch (Computer Laboratory) series. ## This talk is included in these lists:- All Talks (aka the CURE list)
- Computer Laboratory talks
- Room FW26, Computer Laboratory, William Gates Building
- School of Technology
- Semantics Lunch (Computer Laboratory)
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
## Other listsSociology of Intellectuals Reading Group Seminar Type the title of a new list here Workshop on Multimodal Approaches to Language Acquisition## Other talksAutumn Cactus & Succulent Show Are right-half plane zeros necessary for inverse response? It dependsâ€¦ Betrayal, Distrust, and Rationality: Smart Counter-Collusion Contracts for Verifiable Cloud Computing Invariant Kalman filtering Title: Throwing the NET Wider TBC |