The origins of speech and anti-rhythms

Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal

• Laurence White (Plymouth University)
• Thursday 20 October 2016, 16:30-18:30
• GR06/7 English Faculty.

If you have a question about this talk, please contact Valentina Colasanti.

Although early ideas about the isochronous organisation of speech units have consistently been shown to lack empirical support, the proposition that speech is rhythmically organised remains prevalent. The concept of rhythm class is frequently invoked in typological descriptions, and recent studies of the entrainment of neural oscillators to the amplitude envelope of speech often assume a quasi-periodic signal. Typically, however, speech encodes linguistically important distinctions both through spectral and temporal variation, building robust redundancy into the signal and giving rise to a strong tendency to “antirhythm” (cf., Nolan & Jeon, 2014; Pointon, 1980; White, 2014). Presenting results from studies of language discrimination and artificial language learning, I argue that sensitivity to speech rate is evidence of the importance of prediction for listeners, with deviations from temporal expectation interpreted as linguistically meaningful. Expectation arises not only from the signal, however, but also from linguistic context and listener-specific factors such as social experience. Thus, speakers may modulate temporal regularity to trade off their audience’s current need for predictability against a tendency to maximise the informational efficiency of the signal.

This talk is part of the Cambridge University Linguistic Society (LingSoc) series.

This talk is included in these lists:

• All Talks (aka the CURE list)
• Cambridge Forum of Science and Humanities
• Cambridge Language Sciences
• Cambridge University Linguistic Society (LingSoc)
• Cambridge talks
• Chris Davis' list
• GR06/7 English Faculty
• Guy Emerson's list
• Language Sciences for Graduate Students

Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.