COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Stokes Society, Pembroke College > After a century of failure, time now to put science at the heart of drug and alcohol policy
After a century of failure, time now to put science at the heart of drug and alcohol policyAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Graham Edgecombe. The use of the law to control drug use is long established though still unproven in efficacy. Although seemingly obvious that legal interdictions should work there is little evidence to support this assertion. So for example cannabis though illegal is at some time used by nearly half of the population. Similarly drugs like ecstasy and amfetamine are widely used by up to a million young people each weekend. This use is underpinned by a demand for the pleasurable experiences that the drugs produce, and also by a paradoxical desire by some people to break the law. As well as being ineffective for many users prohibition of drugs often leads to perverse magnification of harms and drug use. When the “English” approach to heroin use i.e. prescription to addicts was abolished in the 1970s on moral grounds heroin use increased tenfold in a few years as addicts were forced to become dealers so getting more people addicted to fuel their income. The banning of alcohol in the 1920s in the USA lead to huge criminal expansion of alcohol sales the perpetrators of which turned to other drugs once prohibition was repealed: a legacy that we still experience today. Moreover the un-scientific and arbitrary distinct between legal drugs particularly alcohol and tobacco and “illegal” drugs also has perverse negative consequences. As well as bringing the scientific foundation of the drug laws into disrepute it also precludes the use of possibly life-changing drugs for those who might benefit from them as treatments: examples of these include cannabis for Multiple sclerosis, MDMA [ecstasy] for PTSD and psilocybin for cluster headaches. For these reasons I will argue that there are serious ethical implications for a simplistic prohibitionist approach to drugs and suggest alternative strategies that might be used. This talk is part of the Stokes Society, Pembroke College series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsLeadership for Learning: The Cambridge Network Biophysical Seminar Series 2016/17 Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership Lady Margaret Beaufort Commemoration Event Zoology Graduate Seminars Translating genomicsOther talksAnimal Migration C++11/14 - the new C++ Kiwi Scientific Acceleration on FPGA Towns, Cities and the Tilting of Britain's Political Axis Light Scattering techniques Diagnostics and patient pathways in pancreatic cancer Towards a whole brain model of perceptual learning PTPmesh: Data Center Network Latency Measurements Using PTP The Anne McLaren Lecture: CRISPR-Cas Gene Editing: Biology, Technology and Ethics Market Socialism and Community Rating in Health Insurance Active bacterial suspensions: from individual effort to team work The Move of Economics Ideas and Numbers into Policy |