COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > The Cambridge Group for the History of Population and Social Structure - seminar series > Sample-selection bias in the historical heights literature
Sample-selection bias in the historical heights literatureAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact sja60. Sandwiches and fruit will be available from 12.30 An extensive literature uses anthropometric measures, typically heights, to draw inferences about living standards in the past. This literature’s influence reaches beyond economic history; the results of historical heights research appear as crucial components in development economics and related fields. The historical heights literature often relies on micro-samples drawn from sub-populations that are themselves selected: examples include volunteer soldiers, prisoners, and runaway slaves, among others. Contributors to the heights literature sometimes acknowledge that their samples might not be random draws from the population cohorts in question, but rely on normality alone to correct for potential selection into the sample. We use a simple Roy model to show that selection cannot be resolved simply by augmenting truncated samples for left-tail shortfall. Statistical tests for departures from normality cannot detect selection in Monte Carlo exercises for small to moderate levels of self-selection, obviating a standard test for selection in the heights literature. We show strong evidence of selection using micro-data on the heights of British soldiers in the late eighteen and nineteenth centuries. Consequently, widely accepted results in the literature may not reflect variations in living standards during a soldier’s formative years; observed heights could be predominantly determined by the process determining selection into the sample. A survey of the current historical heights literature illustrates the problem for the three most common sources: military personnel, slaves, and prisoners. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2261335 This talk is part of the The Cambridge Group for the History of Population and Social Structure - seminar series series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsSt Catharine's College Amalgamated Societies Lecture Series Twentieth Century Think Tank State of Exception, Spaces of Terror: The Concentrationary Gothic and Whiteness as Spectral Terrorist Cavendish Quantum Colloquium Humanitarian eventsOther talks70th Anniversary Celebration Kiwi Scientific Acceleration on FPGA Interrogating T cell signalling and effector function in hypoxic environments Simulating Electricity Prices: negative prices and auto-correlation The world is not flat: towards 3D cell biology and 3D devices Stereodivergent Catalysis, Strategies and Tactics Towards Secondary Metabolites as enabling tools for the Study of Natural Products Biology ***PLEASE NOTE THIS SEMINAR IS CANCELLED*** Are hospital admissions for people with palliative care needs avoidable and unwanted? The ‘Easy’ and ‘Hard’ Problems of Consciousness A polyfold lab report St Johns Linacre Lecture 2018: Professor Sir Peter Ratcliffe FRS |