COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Cambridge University Linguistic Society (LingSoc) > Phonetics vs. phonology in Huave consonant-vowel interactions
Phonetics vs. phonology in Huave consonant-vowel interactionsAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact George Walkden. This talk explores phonetic and phonological aspects of diphthongization in Huave (a language isolate of southern Mexico), based on fieldwork with the moribund San Francisco del Mar variety. Huave consonants are contrastively either plain or palatalized, and in coda position this distinction is cued principally on the preceding vowel; the focus here will be on the realization of back vowels /a o u/ as [aj oj uj] before palatalized consonants. Acoustic evidence converges on the idea that this diphthongization is phonological before non-coronals, inserting a segmental offglide and creating long vowel nuclei, but coarticulatory before coronals, where nuclei remain phonologically unaltered and short. In the non-coronal environment, F2 trajectories generally show a transition between two steady states, and vowel duration is comparable to that of aspirated long-vowel nuclei [ah oh uh]. However, when these codas are resyllabified as onsets to suffixes, the F2 rises disappear completely, and durations cluster with short (rather than with long) open-syllable vowels; there thus appears to be a categorical alternation conditioned by syllable structure. In contrast, back vowels before palatalized coronals do not show such alternations in either quality or length. F2 trajectories have a single steady state and a smaller degree of rise at the end, before onsets as well as codas. Similarly, duration patterns with short vowels in both closed and open syllables. Finally, back-vowel nuclei before voiceless coronals and non-coronals behave differently with respect to truncation of intonational pitch accents, although the categoricity of this effect can be questioned. On the basis of the representations inferred from the phonetic results, a phonological analysis is developed in terms of feature-realization strategies for the consonantal palatalization contrast. Time permitting, some methodological and ethical issues that arise in phonetic work on endangered unwritten languages will also be discussed. This talk is part of the Cambridge University Linguistic Society (LingSoc) series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsCambridge Initiative for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering Number Theory Study Group: Langlands correspondence Biocomputing WorkshopsOther talks'Cryptocurrency and BLOCKCHAIN – PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE' Perfect toposes and infinitesimal weak generation Missing friars: rethinking late medieval medicine Title to be confirmed Quantifying Uncertainty in Turbulent Flow Predictions based on RANS/LES Closures Simulating Electricity Prices: negative prices and auto-correlation Café Synthetique: Graduate Talks! The Productivity Paradox: are we too busy to get anything done? Constructing the virtual fundamental cycle Cambridge-Lausanne Workshop 2018 - Day 2 Martin Roth: »Widerrede!« |