COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Cambridge University Linguistic Society (LingSoc) > [Online talk] - The Syntax of Verbs: Language Typology, Language Change and a little bit of Language Acquisition
[Online talk] - The Syntax of Verbs: Language Typology, Language Change and a little bit of Language AcquisitionAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Julia Heine. Please SIGN UP for the event following the link: https://cambridge.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_25lZ6rde33jG62h -- You will receive an attendance link on Thursday before the talk. I begin by presenting the results of recent work in comparative syntax demonstrating three distinct clausal positions for finite verbs in English, French and German (V2). This typology is developed by introducing subject-raising and object-movement so that all the major, non-object-initial word-order patterns of the world’s languages are accounted for (SVO, SOV , VSO and VOS ). Focussing on SVO languages, I next summarise the important proposals in Schifano (2018) showing that across Romance there are at least four distinct landing sites in the Tense-Mood-Aspect zone of the clause for finite lexical verbs, all of them higher than the position of the English lexical verb and lower than the V2 landing site. This leads to a distinction between meso- and microparameters. Chinese illustrates the Tense macroparameter. These results are combined into a Tense-parameter hierarchy. Turning to language change, I present the evidence that Early Modern English was like French with regard to verb-movement. So the V-to-T parameter changed in 17th-century English. This change was connected to a change in the status of tense-agreement inflection, and entailed the introduction of Affix-Hopping as a repair strategy. The same has happened in the very recent history of Faroese. Finally, I briefly look at language acquisition, concentrating on root infinitives. I argue that these appear in two kinds of marked system: non-null-subject languages with V-to-T movement (French, Icelandic) and languages with Affix Hopping (all of Germanic except Icelandic). Modern English is a special case as it involves the nanoparameter of do-support, a highly marked and late-acquired option. This talk is part of the Cambridge University Linguistic Society (LingSoc) series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsScience meets Faith Bus Booking Wednesday Lunch Time Seminar SeriesOther talksCharacterising the Atmospheres and Circumplanetary Environment of Exoplanets Experimental insights on volcanic ash as a reactive agent in the environment Microscopic theories of active particle systems and their entropy production Multistable structures - from energy trapping to morphing. Mapping the hot Universe: the first six months of operations of eROSITA on SRG The influence of Arctic Fog on Glaciers |