|COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring.|
Animal sentience and human values
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Marta Halina.
The science of animal welfare provides an important context in which to consider the role ethical values should, or should not, play in setting appropriate burdens of proof. For example, if animals of a particular species can feel pain, but we fail to accept that they can feel pain when formulating animal welfare regulations, negative welfare consequences are likely to ensue. This has led a number of animal welfare scientists to argue that, with respect to contested invertebrate taxa such as cephalopods, decapods and cyclostomes, the precautionary principle should be applied and the burden of proof should be set intentionally low. However, this proposal has met with resistance from the biomedical research community. I offer a philosophical perspective on this controversy, and I attempt to extract some wider lessons regarding the relationship between science and values.
This talk is part of the Departmental Seminars in History and Philosophy of Science series.
This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.
Other listsScience meets Faith Microsoft Research Summer School ChEBI Users Meeting (EBI, Hinxton, 19th-20th May).
Other talksEmbracing Complexity: A Fly-to-Bedside Approach to Cancer Therapies Dissecting histotype-specific lung cancer vulnerabilities Evolutionary analysis on barcode NGS swine influenza virus data The Anne McLaren Lecture Winning funding – one simple trick for success Dr Maike de la Roche: Hedgehog Signalling in T cells