The problem of confirmation in the Everett interpretation
Add to your list(s)
Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact .
I argue that the Oxford school Everett interpretation is internally incoherent, because we cannot claim that in an Everettian universe the kinds of reasoning we have used to arrive at our beliefs about quantum
mechanics would lead us to form true beliefs. I show that in an Everettian context, the experimental evidence that we have available could not provide empirical confirmation for quantum mechanics, and
moreover that we would not even be able to establish reference to the theoretical entities of quantum mechanics. I then consider a range of existing Everettian approaches to the probability problem and show that they do not succeed in overcoming this incoherence.
This talk is part of the CamPoS (Cambridge Philosophy of Science) seminar series.
This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.
|