You need to be logged in to carry this out. If you don't have an account, feel free to create one. |
COOKIES: By using this website you agree that we can place Google Analytics Cookies on your device for performance monitoring. |
University of Cambridge > Talks.cam > Cambridge University Linguistic Society (LingSoc) > The Domain of Content
The Domain of ContentAdd to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Alison Biggs. An investigation of the properties of derived nominals (Complex Event Nominals in the sense of Grimshaw, 1990) reveals a number of rather surprising facts. First, derived nominals with non-compositional Content (or Sense) cannot be Argument Structure nominals (Complex Event Nominals in the sense of Grimshaw, 1990), contrasting, as such, with identical morpho-phonological forms which do happen to have compositional Content (e.g. transformation in its technical linguistic sense vs. transformation as transparently composed from transform). Second, Argument Structure nominals, but not necessarily others, must embed a constituent that is otherwise a possible independent verb, thereby making e.g. aviation, fiction and petulance perfectly licit derived nominals, but not with an embedded event structure. The contrasts, as it turns out, cannot be accounted for by a lexicalist theory of word formation, nor can they be explained by appealing to any model in which roots are allowed to select arguments. The contrasts, however, can be derived within a wholly syntactic approach to argument structure and to the formation of complex words, in which the domain of non-compositional Content (atomic Content) is defined on the basis of structurally delimited, phonologically realized, syntactic constituents, and is crucially accessible by phase. The argumentation and the conclusions will thus point towards a system of complex word construction which must be syntactic. It will further points towards the need to revise at least some aspects of our understanding concerning the interaction between sound, and specifically phonological realization, and meaning, the latter specifically as in Content. This talk is part of the Cambridge University Linguistic Society (LingSoc) series. This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown. |
Other listsMoral Psychology Research Group Larmor Society DIAL seminars Dominic Sandbrook: 'State of Emergency: Britain in the 1970s' Developmental Biolo Type the title of a new list hereOther talksValidation & testing of novel therapeutic targets to treat osteosarcoma Undersampling in physical imaging inverse problems Cerebral organoids: modelling human brain development and tumorigenesis in stem cell derived 3D culture Around the world in 605 State energy agreements Panel comparisons: Challenor, Ginsbourger, Nobile, Teckentrup and Beck Protein targeting within the chloroplast: a cell-biological view of starch biosynthesis Constructing the virtual fundamental cycle Single Cell Seminars (November) The Gopakumar-Vafa conjecture for symplectic manifolds Inferring the Evolutionary History of Cancers: Statistical Methods and Applications Zone 6 Convention |