University of Cambridge > > CamPoS (Cambridge Philosophy of Science) seminar > On the nonexistence of moralometers

On the nonexistence of moralometers

Add to your list(s) Download to your calendar using vCal

  • UserEric Schwitzgebel (University of California, Riverside)
  • ClockWednesday 09 March 2022, 13:00-14:30
  • HouseZoom.

If you have a question about this talk, please contact Matt Farr.

If we’re interested in studying morality scientifically – for example, to study the effectiveness of moral education programs or to study whether people who behave morally better tend to be happier than their naughtier counterparts – we should be interested in constructing an accurate and reliable means for measuring a person’s overall moral character: a moralometer. Potential moralometers come in four varieties: self-ratings, informant ratings, behavioral observation, and physiological measures. I argue that there are practically insurmountable methodological problems with all four approaches to constructing a moralometer.

This talk is part of the CamPoS (Cambridge Philosophy of Science) seminar series.

Tell a friend about this talk:

This talk is included in these lists:

Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.


© 2006-2024, University of Cambridge. Contact Us | Help and Documentation | Privacy and Publicity