Phlogiston revisited: an argument for scientific pluralism
Add to your list(s)
Download to your calendar using vCal
If you have a question about this talk, please contact Lauren Kassell.
Through a re-examination of the Chemical Revolution, I advance an argument for pluralism in and about science. My assessment of the Chemical Revolution, made on the basis of a comprehensive list of epistemic values, returns the verdict that there was no compelling rational reason for 18th-century chemists to discard the phlogiston theory. I then examine the benefits that could have (or could still) come from retaining or reviving phlogiston. Finally I sketch some general arguments for scientific pluralism, drawing a comparison and contrast with relativism.
This talk is part of the Departmental Seminars in History and Philosophy of Science series.
This talk is included in these lists:
Note that ex-directory lists are not shown.
|